by Furry Girl
05.11.11
"Abolitionist feminists see sex work as coercive and violent and sex workers as 'prostituted victims' in need of rescue. Abolitionist feminists are frequently socially and economically privileged citizens of the global north who use their economic and political clout to support and promote the 'rescue industry'.
[...]
By portraying all sex work as violent and all sex workers as naive victims desperate for rescue, abolitionist feminists perpetuate patriarchal stereotypes and silence the very people they are supposedly trying to help. By refusing to support sex workers in their quest for legitimacy and recognition as workers, they are condemning sex workers to lives in the shadows."
-- Natasha Burge, in Selling Sex: How Abolitionist Feminists Hurt Sex Workers on cchronicle.com
by Furry Girl
04.13.11
"We have an enormous problem with trying to counter people's emotional arguments with rational facts.
After all, if facts were enough, we wouldn't need scare warnings on cigarettes, since the connection between smoking and lung cancer is well and widely known.
From my point of view, while the evidence is clear, there's a problem with trying to gain support from people who don't already subscribe to this view. We definitely need to keep pushing the research, but also, try to tap into the emotional argument in a way so people can understand why the facts matter. Bottom line, when it comes down to Facts vs. Fear Related To Your Kids, most people will choose the fear option 'just to be on the safe side'.
[...]
We need to start thinking about how to make the truth appealing, not inaccessible. We need to tap into cultural values as much as we already rely on intellectual honesty. Let's start the discussion."
-- Brooke Magnanti (aka Belle de Jour), in The Irrationality of the Anti-Sex Lobby on freedominapuritanage.co.uk
For me, as a sex worker, this sort of thing ties into my pleas for more of us to be out. Knowing sex workers, just like knowing queer people, does a lot to chip away at people's prejudices, and ultimately, the laws and politicians put into place by the public. It's harder to legislate against and disregard the safety of sex workers if your brother or daughter or mom is a sex worker.
by Furry Girl
03.21.11
"This whole tradition – the idea that women need be preserved in glass so as not to 'ruin' themselves, lest they diminish their sexual value by 'giving it away' –restricts the lived autonomy of women in ways I can't even begin to articulate. None of the slut-shaming makes sense unless you assume women live to give themselves to men in their purest possible form."
-- Kerry Howley, in Thoughts on Thoughts on Spitzer on reason.com
by Furry Girl
02.28.11
"Behind the most powerful manufactroversies, lies a predictable formula: first, a new problem is generated by redefining terminology. For example, an autism 'epidemic' suddenly exists when a wide range of childhood mental health diagnoses are all reclassified as part of an autism spectrum. The reclassification creates the appearance of a surge in autism cases, and that sets the stage for cause-seeking.
Second, 'instant experts' immediately proclaim that they have special insight into the cause. They enjoy the authority and attention that their unique 'expertise' brings them and begin to position themselves as a 'little guy' crusader against injustice. They also are likely to spin conspiracy theories about government cover-ups or pharmaceutical malfeasance to make their case more appealing to the media. In many cases the experts have a financial incentive in promoting their point of view (they sell treatments or promote their books, for example).
Third, because mainstream media craves David and Goliath stories and always wants to be the first to break news, they often report the information without thorough fact-checking. This results in the phenomenon of 'Tabloid Medicine.'
Fourth, once the news has been reported by a mainstream media outlet, the general population assumes it’s credible, and a groundswell of fear drives online conversation on blogs, websites, and social media platforms.
And finally, celebrities take up the cause while personal injury lawyers feast on frightened consumers who now believe that they are victims of harm perpetrated on them by the 'medical industrial complex.' Meanwhile flustered government health officials have no scientific evidence of harm, but cannot prove a lack of association without further research (and that takes time). So they offer what seems like tepid reassurances, which are perceived by some to be tantamount to an admission of guilt.
And that’s how a lie becomes an urban legend. Perception is nine tenths of reality."
-- Dr. Valerie Jones, in Review: How the Internet is being used to hijack medical science for fear and profit on scientificamerican.com
Hmm, doesn't this sound an awful lot like porn/trafficking/prostitution/sexuality/kink/strip club hysteria?
by Furry Girl
"Manufactroversy (măn’yə-făk’-trə-vûr’sē)
1. A manufactured controversy that is motivated by profit or extreme ideology to intentionally create public confusion about an issue that is not in dispute.
[...]
As a scholar of rhetoric, I have studied some modern cases of manufactured controversy to discover how to best confute these contemporary sophists, and I have come up with some preliminary hypotheses about what makes their arguments so persuasive to a public audience. First, they skillfully invoke values that are shared by the scientific community and the American public alike, like free speech, skeptical inquiry, and the revolutionary force of new ideas against a repressive orthodoxy. It is difficult to argue against someone who invokes these values without seeming unscientific or un-American."
-- Leah Ceccarelli, in Manufactroversy: The Art of Creating Controversy Where None Existed on scienceprogress.org
Sex workers rights advocates have a lot to learn from anti-science lobbying movements and how they work to successfully confuse and misinform the public through "teaching the controversy." See one of my earlier blog posts on the subject here.
by Furry Girl
02.25.11
"It shouldn't be a surprise that more groups than just global warming and evolution deniers use this strategy of designing bad studies and legislating from them. They might be the best known, however, because their motivations are so easily understood. They're downright transparent. A few scattered cranks (there are always stray cranks) aside, the political forces behind evolution denial are religious. Those behind global warming denial represent economic interests that are threatened by our need to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels. These groups are easy to spot because we understand their motivations for winnowing information down to only what they want to believe.
There are topics, however, where the deniers are less obvious, even when they engage in similar tactics. Their motivations are subtle or complex, or they form unlikely coalitions, bound together only by their views on a single subject. The strict marginalization of sex-oriented businesses is one of those topics. It unites pro-business conservatives who are appalled by sex and pro-sex liberals who consider profit equal to exploitation, plus a lot of people whose reasons are as varied as their sexual interests.
Whatever their motivation, those who argue that the presence of adult businesses has a detrimental effect on crime rates and property values are still engaging in the same kind of denialism. They're relying on just a small portion of the available information to make their case."
-- Stephanie Zvan, in Sex, Science, and Social Policy on almostdiamonds.blogspot.com
by Furry Girl
01.24.11
"I don't know to what we owe this phenomenon – the way well-intentioned folks so readily swallow the sordid storytelling and swollen numbers – never questioning their validity, never asking any questions of the purveyors of these second-hand 'facts'. Why do we want to believe this? Why do we always want to believe in the plundering of innocents, the pimp-daddy in the bushes, the young body broken and worn out by repeated bouts of unwanted intercourse?"
-- Juliana Piccillo, in Change.org has changed…to certifiably insane on julianapiccillo.wordpress.com
I expressed similar thoughts a while ago in this post of mine: Degrading, violent desires
by Furry Girl
11.17.10
"The article accepts that 'boys will be boys' when it comes to watching porn but carefully wags its fingers at women who do or might consider watching porn. 'If you hadn't worn that skirt…' it seems to say. 'Nice girls don't go out alone on dark nights.' It is, quite literally, making the claim that if you watch those dark images that they will literally manifest themselves into your life. It's the stuff of mythology or the Twilight Zone and it is a little interesting that this quote pops up on the heels of more and more women speaking out about their interest in porn.
Threatening people with rape is a common tactic of war. It's been used in the past and in the present by those who don't concern themselves with collateral damage so long as they are able to impose their will.
It is a very, very ugly lie to tell."
-- Miss Maggie Mayhem, in Porn & Rape on missmaggiemayhem.com
by Furry Girl
10.22.10
This post is a part of the Scarleteen Sex Ed Blog Carnival. Find links to posts from other participants here. This is veering off the course in which other participants have been headed, since I don't want to write about why sexual education is a good thing, or hit with you my own sales pitch for why Scarleteen and why you should donate, so I've written about a sexual health issue near and dear to me.
...
If you have a uterus and fallopian tubes, you've been hearing the same thing since you were in junior high (or earlier). When it comes to birth control, your options are condoms, the pill, or maybe, if you're feeling unconventional, the shot or the IUD. But what about those of us who don't want to take hormones or have an IUD painfully jammed up our cervixes? I got myself fixed four years ago - via tubal ligation - and I couldn't be happier with it.
First, a note on gender and language: for the sake of brevity and smoother writing, I'm going to refer to those who have a uterus and fallopian tubes as "women", but this doesn't mean that I don't consider trans women to be women, nor do I mean to exclude those who do not identify as women, but who may want a tubal ligation. Birth control isn't only an issue for straight people. Aside from all the bisexuals, consider, for example, a gay-identified, uterus-having FTM trans guy who fucks men, or a cisgender woman who has an non-op/pre-op MTF trans woman as her partner. It's just too hard to write inclusively of every possibility and still have concise, readable sentences.
I have never wanted children. I do not like children. Where most women light up with delirious joy when they see babies and little kids, I'm just hoping the child doesn't vomit or blow its nose on me. I choose to focus my maternal energies on my cat-baby and on my various projects.
Our culture demonizes childfree women as profoundly selfish, cold, and unfeminine. Sterilization for women seems to be more controversial and patently offensive than abortion - I'm not just saying "not right now" to the prospect being a mommy, I'm saying, "absolutely fucking never." I'd guess there are more places in America that will perform abortions than will sterilize childfree women.
Try on these common responses for starters:
"Aww, you'll change your mind when you hit 30! Wait until that biological clock of yours starts a-ticking!"
"Sure, you think don't like kids now, but it's totally different when they're your own!"
"Your life as a woman just won't be complete without experiencing pregnancy and birth!"
"Smart and pretty people need to out-breed those ignorant hicks!"
And so on. All of the sentiments assume, whether overtly or just subtly, that the only reason for me (and by extension, other women) to exist is to pop out babies, that it's where I'll find my "real" happiness in life, and that I'm controlled by a biological clock, incapable of making rational decisions about my fertility.
I've dated a couple of guys who wanted vasectomies. I went to their mandatory counseling sessions with both of them. It was easy as pie! No condescending insults, no pervasive culture of, "Come on, now, all men want to have babies! You'll probably change your mind anyway, you silly creature!" They were dudes, and it's natural for dudes to not want to have kids. No one shames or questions the sanity of men who get sterilized.
I got to watch one of my boys have his vasectomy performed, which was awesome, and took less time than getting a pedicure. Had I been supplied with a syringe of lidocaine and an autoclave, I could have performed his vasectomy on my kitchen counter using cuticle scissors, a crochet hook, and a soldering iron. He didn't even need stitches afterwards, and while he spent a few days taking it easy, he didn't need much pain medication at all. Vasectomy was easy to obtain for him, cheap, and didn't have many risks or a long recovery time.
When I was 22, I decided it was time to get serious about finding a doctor to sterilize me. If you're looking to get a tubal ligation, I highly recommend doing what I did: get a list of doctors from Planned Parenthood that they refer women to for tubal ligations. Here in Seattle, I think it was over a dozen doctors. I called one. I told the receptionist that I'd like to make an appointment to talk about getting a tubal ligation, but that I wanted to make sure before I even bothered to come in that the doctor didn't have a problem sterilizing young childfree women. The receptionist put me on hold, then told me it shouldn't be an issue. My consultation went much better than I expected. I came in there armed to the teeth to argue about my right to be sterilized, but the doctor was already on board. He just gave me a short spiel about how tubal ligations are to be considered permanent. To cap it off, he even ranted briefly about how rude and paternalistic it is that other doctors won't sterilize women who want it. I was in!
My experience in finding a great doctor on the first try seems to be pretty unique, however. Talking with other women, or looking at forums dedicated to birth control, you'll see tale after tale of women frustrated at being denied the right to control their own fertility, belittled by doctors and told that no, they actually will want to have children. I am so glad I didn't have to go through that.
I was scheduled to have a laparoscopic tubal ligation, which means I'd just have one tiny little scar. I decided that I didn't want a sterilization via Essure or the other new methods of inserting things into your fallopian tubes by forcing things up my cervix and (hopefully) correctly into my tubes. Firstly, because the multiple procedures involved in these methods sounded more painful and stressful than tubal surgery, and secondly, because my doctor has been doing tubal ligations for 30 years and not once had any failures that he was aware of. I didn't want to be awake and having someone jab away at my internal organs, I wanted to be knocked out and wake up in recovery when the jabbing was completed.
When my special day in the hospital came, it was a serious, all-day event, not like the "pedicure" my ex had gotten. I switched into a gown, and got an IV line started to give me a saline drip and antibiotics. It was done in a real operating suite, with my doctor, an anesthesiologist, and other helpers there to attend to me. I would have to spend most of the day in recovery in the hospital. (All this means that a tubal ligation costs loads more than a vasectomy. My tubal was 10-20 times as expensive as your average vasectomy.) The method of sterilization my doctor used was placing silicone rubber bands around my doubled-over fallopian tubes, which apparently has a shorter recovery time, and doesn't carry the risk to other internal organs that a slip during a cut-and-cauterization procedure could. Here are my before-and-after shots, look for the white arrow pointing to the doubled-over sections of tube in the lower pictures:

There was a bit of bruising at the incision area, but after just two weeks, you had to look hard to see the small reddened scar that was barely snaking out of my belly button. I will probably never have to worry about pregnancy again. There is a slight risk that my body could "heal" itself, but sterilization beats out other birth control methods for efficacy.
I don't mean to sound like a hippie who's afraid of science, but I'm wary of the long-term effects of women taking birth control pills for 20+ years of their lives. I've still used condoms for most of the sex I've had in the last 4 years, but I'm happy that my backup method is internal and intrinsic, not something external that I have to rely upon being granted access to. No one can ever take away my right to keep being sterilized. It's like a buy-versus-lease question, and I wanted to buy my freedom so no one would ever take it away from me. Although I think it's highly unlikely the government would de-approve the birth control pill, IUDs, and Depo-Provera shots, I really value that I will never have to leave my fertility up to the whims of politicians and the laws of whatever country I might find myself in. (And, you know, after the zombie apocalypse, how many years do you think the remaining stockpile of birth control pills will last?)
I frequently meet other women who either already have an active interest in getting sterilized, or dismissed the idea as just too difficult until they met me. I wish that more people were aware of what tubal ligations involve, and that it's not actually impossible to get them, even if you're young, single, and childfree. As more women are choosing to not have children, I wish the sterilization was as widely-promoted as other forms of birth control, rather than a method relegated to the end of the list, surrounded by extra caveats and dismissive language. It's not for everyone (neither are IUDs, the shot, the patch, or the pill), but if you know that having biological children is not for you, don't be afraid to get out there and demand it. You might get turned down by a doctor or few, but don't get discouraged.
If money is an issue for you, all states have federal funds allocated to providing birth control to those with low-income, free of charge. In Washington state where I live, this Malthusian keep-the-poor-from-breeding-up-more-welfare-babies effort is called "Take Charge", and in Seattle, you need to earn less than (last time I checked) $1600 a month to qualify. (The amount varies by area.) Go to your local Planned Parenthood or other clinic, and ask about funding options if you're low-income. Also, check with doctors about payment plans - that might be an option if you don't have insurance.
So, this is my own contribution to sex education today: telling you about my choice method of pregnancy prevention, and my hope that in time, sterilization for women will become more widely-accessible, and as stigma-free as it is for men.
A few resources:
* Planned Parenthood's info on sterilization for those with eggs and those with sperm
* The sterilizationqa LiveJournal Community (Yeah, I know, shocker - people still use Livejournal)
* The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (I highly recommend the "Biology and Breeding" and "Science Fiction and Fantasy" sections)
* The Baby Boon: How Family-Friendly America Cheats the Childless (Awesome book)
...
Scarleteen is an nonprofit, body-positive resource for young people who are looking for medically-accurate, non-judgmental sex ed. Good projects like Scarleteen can't survive without funding, so consider making a donation. I'm happy to say that my smut company is in the list of the top-tier (over $1000) donors to the site.
by Furry Girl
09.30.10
It seems like every couple of months, there's a new fear-mongering book being hawked by one of the professional feminists about the vileness of sexual commerce. A core component of their actual Serious Face critique of the jizz biz is insinuating that we have the totally unique atrociousness of possessing a financial motivation with our jobs. We in the sex industry work to earn a profit. We make money. We get paid to do stuff. We sell things and services. Gasp!
This line of attack would be hilarious, if it weren't also so disgusting to see that these types make their living off the backs of sex workers - meaning they are literally nothing more than the most disrespectful and exploitative of pimps. They spread panic about us to get interviewed on TV. They use naked photographs of us without permission (in flagrant violation of federal porn statues) during their paid speaking appearances. They twist our words and purposefully misrepresent our stories in their books. They draw salaries as the heads of nonprofits who exist to take away our rights. They make up statistics out of thin air about how awful we are in in order to get donations for their projects. They receive tenure at fancy universities by lying about us to impressionable students.
They have a financial motivation. They are out to earn a profit. They get paid with their book deals and public appearances. And they're probably better at profiting off the exploitation of sex workers than any pimp or trafficker out there.
There's 10 seconds - a single line of dialog - from Wayne's World that always plays in my head whenever I see professional feminists soliciting for their latest cash-grab. Now it can can be what plays in your head, too. This clip is from the middle of a scene of Wayne and Garth ranting about the importance of not selling out, while engaging in product placement.
Furry Girl: a good time not yet had by all.
Activism
- I operate SWAAY.org, an accessible sex workers' rights site that educates the general public about our lives and our issues.
- I've been vegan for 12 years because it's the easiest way for an individual to contribute to less violence, suffering, and exploitation.
My adult sites
- Cocksexual.com: Strapons
- EroticRed.com: Menstruation
- FurryGirl.com: Unshaved
- TheSensualVegan.com: Store
- VegPorn.com: Herbivores
More of me online
Enjoy my writing? I enjoy presents!
Buy SWAAY shirts:
Browse by topic
- (Anti-) Beauty Standards
- Activism
- Add to Your Lexicon
- Advice for Sex Workers
- Allies and "Allies"
- Atheism / Religion
- Blogging
- Book Reviews
- Camming
- Crab Mentality
- Drama
- Events & Happenings
- Feministisms
- Frequently Addressed Accusations
- Government & Law
- Health(care)
- International
- Kink / BDSM
- Labor politics
- Leisure of the Theory Class
- Love & Relationships
- Money
- Nutters & Moralizers
- Other Political Issues
- Personal
- Porn
- Privacy & Anonymity
- Psuedoscience
- Queer / Gender
- Quotes
- Seattle / WA Local
- Sex Toys & Products
- Sex Work
- Sluthood
- SWAAY
- Technology
- The Tyranny of Women
- Trafficking / "Rescue"
- Travel
- Violence Against Sex Workers
New to my blog? Some favorite posts
- "You have no right to dislike feminism after all it's done for you!"
- An argument for more sex workers to be out?
- Degrading, violent desires
- Do you have what it takes to be an empowered sex worker?
- Feminism is the shitty relationship you had in your early 20s
- How are we branding sex workers rights in the US? (Let's focus more on *worker*, less on *sex*!)
- How to do your homework on trafficking, "rescue", and the affected communities
- Loving my enemy and ineffective activism: "ally" commentary surrounding the Stop Porn Culture conference
- Musings on ethical porn and the red herrings of "feminist porn" and "violent porn"
- My call for a "working" class uprising against inaccessible discourse and the over-representation of dabblers
- Sex trafficking is the new crack: manufactured "epidemics" as political tools
- The common logical fallacies deployed by anti-sex worker activists
- Things I've gained from being a sex worker: an anti-paternalistic perspective
- Three out of four ain't bad: my thoughts on Audacia Ray's post on the dominant narratives of sex work
- Vigilantism and 'crushing bastards': in praise of anger, hatred, and taking joy in the smiting of one's enemies
- Want to play BINGO with the antis?
- Watch out for psuedoscience: my long-time nemeses of concern trolling and "teaching the controversy"
- What do I mean when I say "sex worker"? Why I'm against an overly-broad definition
- Why I call them "anti-sex worker" rather than "anti-porn" or "anti-prostitution," and why you should too
Favorite sex/ho blogs
- Amanda Brooks
- Asia Pacific Network of Sex Workers
- Belle de Jour
- Born Whore
- Bound, Not Gagged
- Dan Savage on SLOG
- Danny Wylde
- Jiz Lee
- Kat's Stories
- Laura Agustín
- Lux Nightmare [2006-2007]
- Maggie McNeill
- Miss Maggie Mayhem
- Our Porn, Ourselves
- Sequoia Redd
- Serpent Libertine
- Sex Worker Pie Charts
- Sex Worker Problems
- Sexerati [2005-2009]
- Sexonomics by Brooke Magnanti
- Shit They Say to Sex Workers
- Stuff Sex Workers Eat
- Whore Madonna
Videos and podcasts
Sex workers' rights info
Search

