by Furry Girl
08.25.11
"The verb is transitive: someone gives power to another, or encourages them to take power or find power in themselves. It’s used among those who want to help others identified as oppressed. In Latin America, in educación popular, one of the great cradles of this kind of concept, the word itself didn’t exist until it was translated back from English. To many people, if they know it at all, the word empoderamiento sounds strange. It’s an NGO word, used by either volunteer or paid educators who view themselves as helpers of others or fighters for social justice, and is understood to represent the currently ‘politically correct’ way of thinking about ‘third world’, subaltern or marginalised people. But it remains a transitive verb, which places emphasis on the helper and her vision of her capacity to help, encourage and show the way."
-- Dr. Laura Agustín, in Empowerment, Victims, Violence and Gender Equality on lauraagustin.com
2 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Comment policy for Feminisnt: I do not publish blatant insults and trolling. You must use a name/handle other than anonymous or asdf because I am tired of giving space to detractors who are too lazy to pick a fake handle and too scared to use a real one. I no longer publish comments bitching at me about how feminism is the greatest thing ever. And I may not publish your comment if I have already addressed that specific issue several times already. Read my responses to other comments before asking a new question. Finally, if your comment hinges on an obvious logical fallacy, I might not publish that, either, except to make fun of you. All new commentors have their first comment held for moderation. Commenting on my blog and taking up space on my server is a privilege, not a right.
Furry Girl: a good time not yet had by all.
Activism
- I operate SWAAY.org, an accessible sex workers' rights site that educates the general public about our lives and our issues.
- I've been vegan for 12 years because it's the easiest way for an individual to contribute to less violence, suffering, and exploitation.
My adult sites
- Cocksexual.com: Strapons
- EroticRed.com: Menstruation
- FurryGirl.com: Unshaved
- TheSensualVegan.com: Store
- VegPorn.com: Herbivores
More of me online
Enjoy my writing? I enjoy presents!
Buy SWAAY shirts:
Browse by topic
- (Anti-) Beauty Standards
- 80s Movies' Wisdom
- Activism
- Add to Your Lexicon
- Advice for Sex Workers
- Allies and "Allies"
- Atheism / Religion
- Blogging
- Book Reviews
- Camming
- Crab Mentality
- Drama
- Events & Happenings
- Feministisms
- Frequently Addressed Accusations
- Government & Law
- Health(care)
- Infographics, Memes, & Ads
- International
- Kink / BDSM
- Labor politics
- Leisure of the Theory Class
- Love & Relationships
- Money
- Nutters & Moralizers
- Other Political Issues
- Personal
- Porn
- Privacy & Anonymity
- Psuedoscience
- Queer / Gender
- Quotes
- Seattle / WA Local
- Sex Toys & Products
- Sex Work
- Sluthood
- SWAAY
- Technology
- Trafficking / "Rescue"
- Travel
- Violence Against Sex Workers
- Women as Oppressors
New to my blog? Some favorite posts
- "You have no right to dislike feminism after all it's done for you!"
- An argument for more sex workers to be out?
- Degrading, violent desires
- Do you have what it takes to be an empowered sex worker?
- Feminism is the shitty relationship you had in your early 20s
- How are we branding sex workers rights in the US? (Let's focus more on *worker*, less on *sex*!)
- How to do your homework on trafficking, "rescue", and the affected communities
- Loving my enemy and ineffective activism: "ally" commentary surrounding the Stop Porn Culture conference
- Musings on ethical porn and the red herrings of "feminist porn" and "violent porn"
- My call for a "working" class uprising against inaccessible discourse and the over-representation of dabblers
- Sex trafficking is the new crack: manufactured "epidemics" as political tools
- The common logical fallacies deployed by anti-sex worker activists
- Things I've gained from being a sex worker: an anti-paternalistic perspective
- Three out of four ain't bad: my thoughts on Audacia Ray's post on the dominant narratives of sex work
- Vigilantism and 'crushing bastards': in praise of anger, hatred, and taking joy in the smiting of one's enemies
- Want to play BINGO with the antis?
- Watch out for psuedoscience: my long-time nemeses of concern trolling and "teaching the controversy"
- What do I mean when I say "sex worker"? Why I'm against an overly-broad definition
- Why I call them "anti-sex worker" rather than "anti-porn" or "anti-prostitution," and why you should too
Favorite sex/ho blogs
- Amanda Brooks
- Asia Pacific Network of Sex Workers
- Belle de Jour
- Born Whore
- Bound, Not Gagged
- Dan Savage on SLOG
- Danny Wylde
- Jiz Lee
- Kat's Stories
- Laura Agustín
- Lux Nightmare [2006-2007]
- Maggie McNeill
- Our Porn, Ourselves
- Sequoia Redd
- Serpent Libertine
- Sex Worker Pie Charts
- Sex Worker Problems
- Sexonomics by Brooke Magnanti
- Shit They Say to Sex Workers
- Stuff Sex Workers Eat
- Whore Madonna
Videos and podcasts
Sex workers' rights info
Search

You can't spell "empowerment" without OWE ME.
Comment by Anon in PDX — August 25, 2011 @ 6:24 pm
This is a nice quote, and certainly makes an interesting point about the way helpers view the people they want to help (I have done some volunteer work myself and this view was permeated through the training we got), though the linguistic point of it is just slightly wrong.
Transitive verbs do indeed have an agent and a patiens, respectively someone that does the action and someone that receives it, but this doesn't mean the focus is always on the agent. In fact, you can avoid naming the agent altogether by using the transitive verb in a passive sentence, like "I am really empowered", and not specifying the agent with the preposition "by" (cf. "I am really empowered by Martha"). This is how politicians avoid taking responsibility for certain actions ("mistakes were made"). The emphasis is put their by the way the verb is used, not by its transitive character alone.
Comment by Dennis — January 3, 2012 @ 5:45 pm