<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biography of a pornographic polemic (an FAQ)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feminisnt.com/2009/biography-of-a-pornographic-polemic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feminisnt.com/2009/biography-of-a-pornographic-polemic/</link>
	<description>I&#039;m an atheist who has been a full time pornographer and sex worker for almost 10 years. I&#039;m also a former &#34;sex-positive feminist&#34; who tired of trying to shoehorn my life into a useless ideology like a pair of ill-fitting high heels. I oppose the feminist doctrine that women are inherently feeble victims, brainwashed by &#34;the patriarchy,&#34; and in need of someone to protect and guide us. I operate SWAAY.org, the only American sex workers&#039; rights project aimed solely at public outreach and education. My politics are extremely socially permissive, but mixed on fiscal matters, and I don&#039;t identify with any one political party or label. My philosophy is informed primarily by Patrick Swayze in Roadhouse: &#34;I want you to be nice until it&#039;s time to not be nice.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:42:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina Cobb</title>
		<link>http://www.feminisnt.com/2009/biography-of-a-pornographic-polemic/#comment-30810</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina Cobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 11:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feminisnt.com/?p=34#comment-30810</guid>
		<description>&quot;I am increasingly sickened by the direction feminism in general has taken, away from a concern for women&#039;s welfare and opportunities and towards the creation of a new standard for women to try and squash themselves into; one of sexually neutral, angry, anti-male sentiment.&quot;

I am so sad that this is the direction you are seeing in feminism, Kat and Furry Girl!  I have noticed just the opposite, but I suppose that is because I am more immersed in my own university organization and the movement in terms of online social media (blogs, websites, etc).

When I talk about feminism, I mean the idea that women are entitled to work how they want to work, seek and pursue and education, openly express their ideas, and ESPECIALLY to be able to express themselves sexually.  And this includes watching and/or creating porn—not limited to certain types of porn either.  It&#039;s about being able to fully accept and acknowledge what gets you off, whether that be S&amp;M, mainstream, or anything in between.

Here&#039;s one of my favorite feminist blogs, if you&#039;re interested, &quot;Hey Epiphora.&quot;  She tests and reviews sex toys and porn!  Very interesting, fun posts.  http://www.heyepiphora.com/

Anyhow, I guess what i&#039;m getting at is the direction in which feminism is going really depends on how you look at it and where you stand in the movement.  I hadn&#039;t noticed any of these seemingly-backward changes that you&#039;re speaking of, but that may be because I am a young college student and my point-of-view is completely different from this angle.  I am surrounded by other young, forward-thinking feminists, and I suppose there may be a completely different demographic segment of feminism that I have missed entirely.  And if that&#039;s so, I&#039;m really glad I have missed them because that&#039;s not the kind of feminism I&#039;m all about, and it definitely does not feel empowering to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I am increasingly sickened by the direction feminism in general has taken, away from a concern for women's welfare and opportunities and towards the creation of a new standard for women to try and squash themselves into; one of sexually neutral, angry, anti-male sentiment."</p>
<p>I am so sad that this is the direction you are seeing in feminism, Kat and Furry Girl!  I have noticed just the opposite, but I suppose that is because I am more immersed in my own university organization and the movement in terms of online social media (blogs, websites, etc).</p>
<p>When I talk about feminism, I mean the idea that women are entitled to work how they want to work, seek and pursue and education, openly express their ideas, and ESPECIALLY to be able to express themselves sexually.  And this includes watching and/or creating porn—not limited to certain types of porn either.  It's about being able to fully accept and acknowledge what gets you off, whether that be S&amp;M, mainstream, or anything in between.</p>
<p>Here's one of my favorite feminist blogs, if you're interested, "Hey Epiphora."  She tests and reviews sex toys and porn!  Very interesting, fun posts.  <a href="http://www.heyepiphora.com/">http://www.heyepiphora.com/</a></p>
<p>Anyhow, I guess what i'm getting at is the direction in which feminism is going really depends on how you look at it and where you stand in the movement.  I hadn't noticed any of these seemingly-backward changes that you're speaking of, but that may be because I am a young college student and my point-of-view is completely different from this angle.  I am surrounded by other young, forward-thinking feminists, and I suppose there may be a completely different demographic segment of feminism that I have missed entirely.  And if that's so, I'm really glad I have missed them because that's not the kind of feminism I'm all about, and it definitely does not feel empowering to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina Cobb</title>
		<link>http://www.feminisnt.com/2009/biography-of-a-pornographic-polemic/#comment-30808</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina Cobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feminisnt.com/?p=34#comment-30808</guid>
		<description>Hello Furry Girl,

You seem like a very intelligent woman, but after reading your faq I am very confused as to how you have acquired the views of feminism that you have.  I have never met a single feminist who believes that women are &quot;feeble-minded,&quot; and I know the reason I am a feminist is because even today, in this supposedly &quot;forward&quot; nation, I was not allowed to join the only engineering honors society on my university campus.  I do not think I am crazy to want to be able to make the same connections in the engineering world as my male counterparts.  Is it not a sign for alarm when women are being denied the opportunity to join organizations to further academic success?

I started the Feminist Honor Society at my university, and in the two years we have been an organization, we have made all major-specific honor societies gender-neutral, we have raised thousands of dollars to support math and science camps for young women, and we have created a yearly need/merit-based scholarship that is awarded to an incoming female engineer.

We don&#039;t hate men at all.  I love men, I just want to ensure that I am given the same opportunities as they are. 

I am sorry that you seem to have had such a negative experience with feminism in your life, but for me, it has given me the confidence to be strong-headed and never accept judgement based solely off of my gender.

Also, I&#039;m sure there are arguments on both sides of the stone, but I know that for me feminism is very much about sexual empowerment for women!  I am all for what you are doing, and the sexual rights of women in general.  I, for one, LOVE to watch porn (sorry if I&#039;m getting too personal), and I completely reject the traditional idea that so many cultures (including American culture) hold that women shouldn&#039;t be able to freely express themselves sexually.

All I&#039;m saying is, I feel like when people read the sorts of things you have written in your faq, it gives them the impression that that is how all feminists must be, and in my experience the type of woman you are describing shouldn&#039;t even be allowed to call herself a feminist, because she is pushing the rights and opportunities for women in the opposite direction.

I just wanted to share this outlook with you.  It is hard enough for me to face the stereotypes that people already have about feminists, and to see a fellow strong woman perpetuating such a stereotype really hits me in the heart.  :(

Sincerely,

Kristina Cobb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Furry Girl,</p>
<p>You seem like a very intelligent woman, but after reading your faq I am very confused as to how you have acquired the views of feminism that you have.  I have never met a single feminist who believes that women are "feeble-minded," and I know the reason I am a feminist is because even today, in this supposedly "forward" nation, I was not allowed to join the only engineering honors society on my university campus.  I do not think I am crazy to want to be able to make the same connections in the engineering world as my male counterparts.  Is it not a sign for alarm when women are being denied the opportunity to join organizations to further academic success?</p>
<p>I started the Feminist Honor Society at my university, and in the two years we have been an organization, we have made all major-specific honor societies gender-neutral, we have raised thousands of dollars to support math and science camps for young women, and we have created a yearly need/merit-based scholarship that is awarded to an incoming female engineer.</p>
<p>We don't hate men at all.  I love men, I just want to ensure that I am given the same opportunities as they are. </p>
<p>I am sorry that you seem to have had such a negative experience with feminism in your life, but for me, it has given me the confidence to be strong-headed and never accept judgement based solely off of my gender.</p>
<p>Also, I'm sure there are arguments on both sides of the stone, but I know that for me feminism is very much about sexual empowerment for women!  I am all for what you are doing, and the sexual rights of women in general.  I, for one, LOVE to watch porn (sorry if I'm getting too personal), and I completely reject the traditional idea that so many cultures (including American culture) hold that women shouldn't be able to freely express themselves sexually.</p>
<p>All I'm saying is, I feel like when people read the sorts of things you have written in your faq, it gives them the impression that that is how all feminists must be, and in my experience the type of woman you are describing shouldn't even be allowed to call herself a feminist, because she is pushing the rights and opportunities for women in the opposite direction.</p>
<p>I just wanted to share this outlook with you.  It is hard enough for me to face the stereotypes that people already have about feminists, and to see a fellow strong woman perpetuating such a stereotype really hits me in the heart.  :(</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Kristina Cobb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not all sex workers love Occupy: the creepy dynamic of pretending to speak for &#8220;the 99%&#8221; &#171; escorts are for women too</title>
		<link>http://www.feminisnt.com/2009/biography-of-a-pornographic-polemic/#comment-29774</link>
		<dc:creator>Not all sex workers love Occupy: the creepy dynamic of pretending to speak for &#8220;the 99%&#8221; &#171; escorts are for women too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feminisnt.com/?p=34#comment-29774</guid>
		<description>[...] by Furry Girl responding to the connections being drawn between sex worker activism and the Occupy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Furry Girl responding to the connections being drawn between sex worker activism and the Occupy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Furry Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.feminisnt.com/2009/biography-of-a-pornographic-polemic/#comment-28441</link>
		<dc:creator>Furry Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feminisnt.com/?p=34#comment-28441</guid>
		<description>Good points, Daen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, Daen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daen de Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.feminisnt.com/2009/biography-of-a-pornographic-polemic/#comment-27910</link>
		<dc:creator>Daen de Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 19:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feminisnt.com/?p=34#comment-27910</guid>
		<description>Very cogently argued.  I understand the anger that some women feel towards patriarchialism and the imbalance of the sexes.  We all know that the scales are still tipped in favour of men, by men, in so many parts of the world, the West included, so the misandry is, to some extent, justified.  But, as you mention, there really is an almost asexual quality to quite a lot of feminist principles.  I can understand how that arises: for some men, women are nothing more than sexual objects, so by removing sex from the equation, the argument goes, you force those men to focus on the real issues.  But those men&#039;s attitude to sex is *already* one of the real issues, perhaps the main issue that women have to contend with when dealing with men, specifically that men need to learn to treat women with more respect, regardless of how she chooses to dress or what she looks like.  And by sweeping it under the carpet by pretending that female sexuality is irrelevant or non-existent, the patriarchialists automatically win: they have once again gotten women to modify their own behaviour for the sake of men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cogently argued.  I understand the anger that some women feel towards patriarchialism and the imbalance of the sexes.  We all know that the scales are still tipped in favour of men, by men, in so many parts of the world, the West included, so the misandry is, to some extent, justified.  But, as you mention, there really is an almost asexual quality to quite a lot of feminist principles.  I can understand how that arises: for some men, women are nothing more than sexual objects, so by removing sex from the equation, the argument goes, you force those men to focus on the real issues.  But those men's attitude to sex is *already* one of the real issues, perhaps the main issue that women have to contend with when dealing with men, specifically that men need to learn to treat women with more respect, regardless of how she chooses to dress or what she looks like.  And by sweeping it under the carpet by pretending that female sexuality is irrelevant or non-existent, the patriarchialists automatically win: they have once again gotten women to modify their own behaviour for the sake of men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feminism: Still Not Getting It &#171; La Libertine&#039;s Salon</title>
		<link>http://www.feminisnt.com/2009/biography-of-a-pornographic-polemic/#comment-25142</link>
		<dc:creator>Feminism: Still Not Getting It &#171; La Libertine&#039;s Salon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feminisnt.com/?p=34#comment-25142</guid>
		<description>[...] be the typical illiterate &#8220;feminist&#8221;, when I linked to two separate statements, one by FurryGrrl and the other by Dr. Brooke Magnanti (aka Belle de Jour) about why they don&#8217;t call themselves [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be the typical illiterate &#8220;feminist&#8221;, when I linked to two separate statements, one by FurryGrrl and the other by Dr. Brooke Magnanti (aka Belle de Jour) about why they don&#8217;t call themselves [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H. Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.feminisnt.com/2009/biography-of-a-pornographic-polemic/#comment-24950</link>
		<dc:creator>H. Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feminisnt.com/?p=34#comment-24950</guid>
		<description>Stumbled onto your blog through http://sexisnottheenemy.tumblr.com/ .  You might be my favorite internet person now.  Thank you for being awesome and putting words to thoughts I have often had, and for having intriguing taste in books.  -- some random chick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stumbled onto your blog through <a href="http://sexisnottheenemy.tumblr.com/">http://sexisnottheenemy.tumblr.com/</a> .  You might be my favorite internet person now.  Thank you for being awesome and putting words to thoughts I have often had, and for having intriguing taste in books.  -- some random chick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabiana</title>
		<link>http://www.feminisnt.com/2009/biography-of-a-pornographic-polemic/#comment-23074</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feminisnt.com/?p=34#comment-23074</guid>
		<description>Your personal path is quite amusing. Can&#039;t help making a swift study on your profile. Would love to check out your ideas again in 20yrs.
Good luck in finding whatever you&#039;re looking for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your personal path is quite amusing. Can't help making a swift study on your profile. Would love to check out your ideas again in 20yrs.<br />
Good luck in finding whatever you're looking for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N</title>
		<link>http://www.feminisnt.com/2009/biography-of-a-pornographic-polemic/#comment-21906</link>
		<dc:creator>N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 00:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feminisnt.com/?p=34#comment-21906</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m certainly with you all the way on not being a feminist, but I don&#039;t think the &#039;suffragette&#039; line works as well. It&#039;s that the suffrage movement isn&#039;t necessary today, it&#039;s outdated. Sexism isn&#039;t outdated today.

I just call myself anti-sexist, and fuck the feminists who think the world won&#039;t be perfect until I call myself one. (Side note, sex-positive feminists consider Dworkinites to be feminist (because they think they&#039;re for equality), yet they won&#039;t consider calling conservatives who think they&#039;re for equality because they don&#039;t want burkas, to be feminist as well.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm certainly with you all the way on not being a feminist, but I don't think the 'suffragette' line works as well. It's that the suffrage movement isn't necessary today, it's outdated. Sexism isn't outdated today.</p>
<p>I just call myself anti-sexist, and fuck the feminists who think the world won't be perfect until I call myself one. (Side note, sex-positive feminists consider Dworkinites to be feminist (because they think they're for equality), yet they won't consider calling conservatives who think they're for equality because they don't want burkas, to be feminist as well.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Furry Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.feminisnt.com/2009/biography-of-a-pornographic-polemic/#comment-21416</link>
		<dc:creator>Furry Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 03:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feminisnt.com/?p=34#comment-21416</guid>
		<description>Howard: I don&#039;t do that sort of sex work, but I&#039;ll shoot you an email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard: I don't do that sort of sex work, but I'll shoot you an email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 296/312 objects using memcached

Served from: www.feminisnt.com @ 2012-02-04 20:08:07 -->
